Post by +Mozzy on Jan 16, 2017 7:47:20 GMT
cannot be played consistently well without the ability to make good decisions. Learning how to repeatedly make accurate decisions in the presence of complex situations is essential for success. However, keeping this up is a very difficult task. We have certain mental tendencies that influence us in ways that can cause dumb thinking and terrible mistakes.
Animosity Towards Losses, Consistency, and Self-Deceit
We all have a natural animosity toward our losses. We don’t like things taken away from us. To some, losing a match is almost unbearable. Think about how many players practice for hours, save money, and travel long distances to attend a tournament. Consider the commitment and investments made to increase the chance of winning: it’s no wonder why most would much rather commit so much time to increase their chances of winning instead of losing. Losing is not an option that is often considered. Sometimes, thinking about worst case scenarios can better prepare us for unfortunate events. Often we are blinded by our aspirations and easily forfeit our ability to critique our own ideas and motives.
So let's say you are preparing your decks for an Opem Cup for the Championship Tour and you have practiced at least 20 hours prior to the event. You feel that your decks are ready and it has "proven" that it can consistently perform well against the expected matchups. The night before the event, you’re playing some practice games just to "warm up." About 20 games into the process you find that you’re not winning as much. All of a sudden you start to panic. You ask: "Is there something wrong with my deck? Did my friend just get lucky?" Naturally, you disregard your previous thoughts. "Nah, my decks should work out just fine. There’s no need to improve it just because I lost a little bit." The following day, well into round 3, you find that you’re having more trouble than you expected. "My decks should be winning without much trouble, why am I having such a hard time?"
Now you’ve made it to round 6. You’ve won so far despite having a few near-losses here and there. Unfortunately, round 6 is where your luck took a sudden turn for the worst: you’ve lost the match. You begin to doubt yourself and question your deck’s consistency. "There must be something wrong with my deck. It tested perfectly: why am I still losing matches?" At this point you’re a bit angry.
In your mind, you’ve been dealt an injustice by lady luck and you deserve to win because you’ve practiced so hard, spent X amount of money, and traveled X miles. You’re supposed to win right?! Why is this happening? "It’s just not fair!"
Since we naturally want to avoid losing or even feeling like we’ve lost, we tend to disregard many obvious warning signs trying to tell us that something may need to be reconsidered. We want to be consistent with our decisions and actions. When we commit to something, we have a natural inclination to stay the course. We will consciously ignore any information that tells us that we may be on the wrong path, even if it costs us greatly to stay on it. We tend to believe that a little more time, a little more money, or a little more effort will make things better. You have to be very careful with this behavior.
Many players fall prey to the same mental trap: avoiding asking the potentially unsettling questions that may yield answers they’re not comfortable facing. One good way to prevent massive errors in judgment is to not avoid questions like these: they will improve your overall win/loss record more than you think. Consider the possibility that your line-up and tech choices are not as tuned to the metagame as you believe. Think about the possibility that your testing partners may not be as good as you or may play in a manner that is atypical of the competition at the next event. Also, take into consideration the fact that your decks may not be as consistent as you think. It is possible to have more than a few good draws that lead to potentially misleading results about the overall strength of your deck.
It’s important to think carefully about the consequences of being wrong. Ask: "What if I am wrong? Can I handle being wrong? What will it cost me emotionally or financially?"
Underestimating the Influence of RNG and Undesirable Outcomes
We play a card game that has a good deal of RNG involved, and sometimes luck is in your favor the night before the tournament. Just because you’ve had excellent draws prior to the main event doesn’t mean that the same fortune will reappear the next day. There isn’t a record of how lucky or unlucky you have been in the past. The odds are all the same regardless (Assuming your decks are unchanged and your playstyle remains relatively the same). If your deck loses 20% of its games to Aggro Shaman, then that 20% may repeat itself multiple times in a row. Over the course of 500 games or so, your loss ratio to Aggro Shaman will average out to 20%, but there may be instances within the span of 500 games when you lose ten to twenty times in a row. You are more likely to win over time, but you can still have losing streaks.
Everyone knows that the odds of flipping head or tails is almost 50/50. However, if you took the time to flip a coin 100 times in a row, you may flip ten heads in a row, then flip a few tails, and back to heads again. Did the odds change? No. They’re still the same. The odds are unchanged during each independent event. Getting five in a row does not give you better or worse odds of flipping heads or tails. Understanding how luck really works will help you develop a much better attitude toward the inevitable misfortunes that occur in competitive play. The win ratios that you glean from using the standard testing techniques should only be used to infer what the odds of your victory are: it is not a guarantee. Take that information with a grain of salt.
Normally, we get upset when we lose in situations we classify as "pure luck." I’ll be the first to admit that I hate losing when it’s out of my control. There are things you can do to push the odds more in your favor. Here are some thoughts:
- Do the best you can to build decks that are as mathematically consistent as possible. The greatest leverage you have against the luck factor is to make sure your deck’s math is consistent enough to minimize the instances in which luck can fuck up your match.
- There are many factors that influence your win/loss ratio versus any type of deck, but in terms of pure chance, always remember: chance has no memory. It does not care how many times you win or lose.
- If your deck isn’t working during testing and you find yourself getting frustrated, then I suggest you give it a rest and call it a night. There’s no use in trying to make alterations to your deck while you’re in the midst of a quiet rage.
- Test games and tournament games occur in two mutually exclusive environments.
- Consider the possibility of being wrong about your individual card choices and plays. Think about the possible undesirable outcomes that may result from your decisions: don’t narrow your vision to only outcomes you want.
- Most of the time putting in a little more effort, money, or time won’t make it better. Knowing when to put a bad idea, situation to rest is very helpful and very wise. Consider the costs and Don't get Mad, get better.
Animosity Towards Losses, Consistency, and Self-Deceit
We all have a natural animosity toward our losses. We don’t like things taken away from us. To some, losing a match is almost unbearable. Think about how many players practice for hours, save money, and travel long distances to attend a tournament. Consider the commitment and investments made to increase the chance of winning: it’s no wonder why most would much rather commit so much time to increase their chances of winning instead of losing. Losing is not an option that is often considered. Sometimes, thinking about worst case scenarios can better prepare us for unfortunate events. Often we are blinded by our aspirations and easily forfeit our ability to critique our own ideas and motives.
So let's say you are preparing your decks for an Opem Cup for the Championship Tour and you have practiced at least 20 hours prior to the event. You feel that your decks are ready and it has "proven" that it can consistently perform well against the expected matchups. The night before the event, you’re playing some practice games just to "warm up." About 20 games into the process you find that you’re not winning as much. All of a sudden you start to panic. You ask: "Is there something wrong with my deck? Did my friend just get lucky?" Naturally, you disregard your previous thoughts. "Nah, my decks should work out just fine. There’s no need to improve it just because I lost a little bit." The following day, well into round 3, you find that you’re having more trouble than you expected. "My decks should be winning without much trouble, why am I having such a hard time?"
Now you’ve made it to round 6. You’ve won so far despite having a few near-losses here and there. Unfortunately, round 6 is where your luck took a sudden turn for the worst: you’ve lost the match. You begin to doubt yourself and question your deck’s consistency. "There must be something wrong with my deck. It tested perfectly: why am I still losing matches?" At this point you’re a bit angry.
In your mind, you’ve been dealt an injustice by lady luck and you deserve to win because you’ve practiced so hard, spent X amount of money, and traveled X miles. You’re supposed to win right?! Why is this happening? "It’s just not fair!"
Since we naturally want to avoid losing or even feeling like we’ve lost, we tend to disregard many obvious warning signs trying to tell us that something may need to be reconsidered. We want to be consistent with our decisions and actions. When we commit to something, we have a natural inclination to stay the course. We will consciously ignore any information that tells us that we may be on the wrong path, even if it costs us greatly to stay on it. We tend to believe that a little more time, a little more money, or a little more effort will make things better. You have to be very careful with this behavior.
Many players fall prey to the same mental trap: avoiding asking the potentially unsettling questions that may yield answers they’re not comfortable facing. One good way to prevent massive errors in judgment is to not avoid questions like these: they will improve your overall win/loss record more than you think. Consider the possibility that your line-up and tech choices are not as tuned to the metagame as you believe. Think about the possibility that your testing partners may not be as good as you or may play in a manner that is atypical of the competition at the next event. Also, take into consideration the fact that your decks may not be as consistent as you think. It is possible to have more than a few good draws that lead to potentially misleading results about the overall strength of your deck.
It’s important to think carefully about the consequences of being wrong. Ask: "What if I am wrong? Can I handle being wrong? What will it cost me emotionally or financially?"
Underestimating the Influence of RNG and Undesirable Outcomes
We play a card game that has a good deal of RNG involved, and sometimes luck is in your favor the night before the tournament. Just because you’ve had excellent draws prior to the main event doesn’t mean that the same fortune will reappear the next day. There isn’t a record of how lucky or unlucky you have been in the past. The odds are all the same regardless (Assuming your decks are unchanged and your playstyle remains relatively the same). If your deck loses 20% of its games to Aggro Shaman, then that 20% may repeat itself multiple times in a row. Over the course of 500 games or so, your loss ratio to Aggro Shaman will average out to 20%, but there may be instances within the span of 500 games when you lose ten to twenty times in a row. You are more likely to win over time, but you can still have losing streaks.
Everyone knows that the odds of flipping head or tails is almost 50/50. However, if you took the time to flip a coin 100 times in a row, you may flip ten heads in a row, then flip a few tails, and back to heads again. Did the odds change? No. They’re still the same. The odds are unchanged during each independent event. Getting five in a row does not give you better or worse odds of flipping heads or tails. Understanding how luck really works will help you develop a much better attitude toward the inevitable misfortunes that occur in competitive play. The win ratios that you glean from using the standard testing techniques should only be used to infer what the odds of your victory are: it is not a guarantee. Take that information with a grain of salt.
Normally, we get upset when we lose in situations we classify as "pure luck." I’ll be the first to admit that I hate losing when it’s out of my control. There are things you can do to push the odds more in your favor. Here are some thoughts:
- Do the best you can to build decks that are as mathematically consistent as possible. The greatest leverage you have against the luck factor is to make sure your deck’s math is consistent enough to minimize the instances in which luck can fuck up your match.
- There are many factors that influence your win/loss ratio versus any type of deck, but in terms of pure chance, always remember: chance has no memory. It does not care how many times you win or lose.
- If your deck isn’t working during testing and you find yourself getting frustrated, then I suggest you give it a rest and call it a night. There’s no use in trying to make alterations to your deck while you’re in the midst of a quiet rage.
- Test games and tournament games occur in two mutually exclusive environments.
- Consider the possibility of being wrong about your individual card choices and plays. Think about the possible undesirable outcomes that may result from your decisions: don’t narrow your vision to only outcomes you want.
- Most of the time putting in a little more effort, money, or time won’t make it better. Knowing when to put a bad idea, situation to rest is very helpful and very wise. Consider the costs and Don't get Mad, get better.